Institution record
JDFX
JD Capital Financial Group Limite
- Source score
- 1.0
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for JDFX and other records in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JDFX (this record) | FMA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 1.0 | 0 |
Financial Services Authority SeychellesFMA | 1 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
Financial Services Commission, MauritiusFMA | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Services Authority SeychellesSVG FSACYSEC | 2 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 7.3 | 0 | |
Financial Services Authority SeychellesFinancial Services Commission, Belize (IFSC / FSC)BaFin+1 | 1 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 | |
Financial Services Commission, MauritiusFinancial Services Authority SeychellesCYSEC+1 | 3 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
JDFX: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is JDFX's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 1 licence entry associated with JDFX (legal entity reference: JD Capital Financial Group Limite); 1 are labelled "regulated" and 1 are labelled regulated or registered: FMA (Financial Markets Authority) — licence 302606, status: regulated. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official FMA public register.
Which of JDFX's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
No matching licence records were found in this site's selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions source selection. The dataset may be incomplete; check the relevant official registers before drawing conclusions about authorisation or jurisdiction.
What is JDFX's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
JDFX carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 1.0, risk & licensing: 1.0, brand: 1.0, market influence: 1.0, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to JDFX's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with JDFX, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FMA.