1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Neomarkets vs SushiSwap: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Neomarkets (Neomarkets Group Ltd) and SushiSwap (SushiSwap) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
Neomarkets and SushiSwap are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Neomarkets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SushiSwap holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Neomarkets | SushiSwap | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Neomarkets |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Neomarkets |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Neomarkets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Neomarkets vs SushiSwap
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Neomarkets | SushiSwap |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Neomarkets Group Ltd | SushiSwap |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Suite 201, 2nd Floor, The Catalyst, 40 Silicon Ave, Ebene 72201, Republic of Mauritius | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Currency pairs, CFDs, oil, gold, silver, indices, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies | Trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Neomarkets and SushiSwap against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Neomarkets vs SushiSwap
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Neomarkets or SushiSwap?
Both Neomarkets and SushiSwap hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Neomarkets maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SushiSwap maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Neomarkets and SushiSwap?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Neomarkets records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with SushiSwap at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Neomarkets and SushiSwap differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Neomarkets lists Currency pairs, CFDs, oil, gold, silver, indices, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies with execution software [MT4, MT5], while SushiSwap lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Neomarkets or SushiSwap?
Neomarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SushiSwap carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.