1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
MintSwap vs Neomarkets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of MintSwap (MintSwap) and Neomarkets (Neomarkets Group Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
MintSwap and Neomarkets are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, MintSwap holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Neomarkets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | MintSwap | Neomarkets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Neomarkets |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Neomarkets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: MintSwap vs Neomarkets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | MintSwap | Neomarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | MintSwap | Neomarkets Group Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | Suite 201, 2nd Floor, The Catalyst, 40 Silicon Ave, Ebene 72201, Republic of Mauritius |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | decentralised exchange (DEX), NFT marketplace, NFTFi, liquidity mining, staking, cross-chain bridging | Currency pairs, CFDs, oil, gold, silver, indices, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare MintSwap and Neomarkets against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: MintSwap vs Neomarkets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: MintSwap or Neomarkets?
Both MintSwap and Neomarkets hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, MintSwap maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Neomarkets maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between MintSwap and Neomarkets?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), MintSwap records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Neomarkets at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do MintSwap and Neomarkets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
MintSwap lists decentralised exchange (DEX), NFT marketplace, NFTFi, liquidity mining, staking, cross-chain bridging with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Neomarkets lists Currency pairs, CFDs, oil, gold, silver, indices, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: MintSwap or Neomarkets?
MintSwap carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Neomarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.