1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Levels vs tops.fun: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Levels (Levels Ltd) and tops.fun (tops.fun) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
Levels and tops.fun are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.7 vs 1.7)
On supervisory breadth, Levels holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas tops.fun holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Levels | tops.fun | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Levels vs tops.fun
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Levels | tops.fun |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Levels Ltd | tops.fun |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Ground floor, The sotheby building, Rodney Bay, Gros-Islet, Saint-Lucia P.O Box 838, castries, Saint Lucia 13 El-Gaish Rd, Al Ibrahimeyah Bahri WA Sidi Gaber, Bab Sharqi, Alexandria Governorate 5424070, Egypt | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Levels and tops.fun against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Levels vs tops.fun
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Levels or tops.fun?
Both Levels and tops.fun hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Levels maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas tops.fun maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Levels and tops.fun?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Levels records an Overall Score of 1.7 (Risk & Licensing: 1.7, Brand: 1.7, Market Influence: 1.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with tops.fun at 1.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.7, Brand: 1.7, Market Influence: 1.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Levels and tops.fun differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Levels lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT5], while tops.fun lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Levels or tops.fun?
Levels carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while tops.fun carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.