1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
INVAXA vs MAPS IG: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of INVAXA (Limehouse Markets (Global) Limited) and MAPS IG (MAPS IG) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
INVAXA outranks MAPS IG by +5.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, INVAXA holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MAPS IG holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | INVAXA | MAPS IG | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | INVAXA |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | INVAXA |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | INVAXA |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.6 | 1.0 | +4.6 | INVAXA |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | INVAXA |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: INVAXA vs MAPS IG
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | INVAXA | MAPS IG |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Limehouse Markets (Global) Limited | MAPS IG |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | CT House, Office No. 9A, Providence, Mahe, Seychelles | SC |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, stocks, commodities, cryptocurrencies, indices and more | Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare INVAXA and MAPS IG against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: INVAXA vs MAPS IG
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: INVAXA or MAPS IG?
Both INVAXA and MAPS IG hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, INVAXA maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MAPS IG maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between INVAXA and MAPS IG?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), INVAXA records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.6, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with MAPS IG at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do INVAXA and MAPS IG differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
INVAXA lists Forex, stocks, commodities, cryptocurrencies, indices and more with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MAPS IG lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: INVAXA or MAPS IG?
INVAXA carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MAPS IG carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.