1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
iBroker vs Squared Financial: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of iBroker (iBroker Global Marketssv) and Squared Financial (Squared Financial Services Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
Squared Financial outranks iBroker by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, iBroker holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Squared Financial holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | iBroker | Squared Financial | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Squared Financial |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Squared Financial |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Squared Financial |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Squared Financial |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: iBroker vs Squared Financial
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | iBroker | Squared Financial |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | iBroker Global Marketssv | Squared Financial Services Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 3 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | iBroker Global Markets Sociedad de Valores, SA, C. de Caleruega, 102-104, Bajo A, Cdad.Lineal, 28033 Madrid, Spain | Archbishop Makariou, 205, VICTORY HOUSE, BLOCK A, Floor 5, 3030, Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | CFD trading on foreign exchange, metals, indices, energy, futures, stocks, ETFs and more |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Spanish, Italian, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare iBroker and Squared Financial against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: iBroker vs Squared Financial
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: iBroker or Squared Financial?
Squared Financial holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 0). Specifically, iBroker maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CNMV) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Squared Financial maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles, CNMV, CYSEC, AMF) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between iBroker and Squared Financial?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), iBroker records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Squared Financial at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do iBroker and Squared Financial differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
iBroker lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Squared Financial lists CFD trading on foreign exchange, metals, indices, energy, futures, stocks, ETFs and more with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: iBroker or Squared Financial?
iBroker carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Squared Financial carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.