1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Glassnode vs NAKA: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Glassnode (Glassnode) and NAKA (NAKA Global Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
NAKA outranks Glassnode by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Glassnode holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas NAKA holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Glassnode | NAKA | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | NAKA |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | NAKA |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | NAKA |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | NAKA |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | NAKA |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Glassnode vs NAKA
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Glassnode | NAKA |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Glassnode | NAKA Global Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | FSRC: Not suppliedFINMA: Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | CH | Address: Bahnhofstrasse 10, 6300 Zug, Switzerland. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Glassnode and NAKA against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Glassnode vs NAKA
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Glassnode or NAKA?
NAKA holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, Glassnode maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas NAKA maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (FSRC, FINMA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Glassnode and NAKA?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Glassnode records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with NAKA at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Glassnode and NAKA differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Glassnode lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while NAKA lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Glassnode or NAKA?
Glassnode carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while NAKA carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.