1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FXGlobe vs Tink: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXGlobe (FXGLOBE) and Tink (Tink Financial Services Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
FXGlobe outranks Tink by +3.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.6)
On supervisory breadth, FXGlobe holds 8 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 8 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Tink holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FXGlobe | Tink | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.6 | +3.4 | FXGlobe |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.2 | +3.8 | FXGlobe |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | FXGlobe |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.6 | +3.4 | FXGlobe |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.2 | +3.8 | FXGlobe |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXGlobe vs Tink
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FXGlobe | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FXGLOBE | Tink Financial Services Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 8 regulated / 8 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FI: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | VU | Vasagatan 11, 111 20 Stockholm, Sweden |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FXGlobe and Tink against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FXGlobe vs Tink
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXGlobe or Tink?
FXGlobe holds more active regulated filings (8 vs 1). Specifically, FXGlobe maintains 8 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC, BoL, FI, FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Tink maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FI) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXGlobe and Tink?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXGlobe records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Tink at 1.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do FXGlobe and Tink differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FXGlobe lists general financial services with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Tink lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXGlobe or Tink?
FXGlobe carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Tink carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.