1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FTD vs stabble: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FTD (FTD Limited) and stabble (stabble) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
FTD outranks stabble by +0.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.5 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, FTD holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas stabble holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FTD | stabble | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.5 | 2.0 | +0.5 | FTD |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.5 | 2.0 | +0.5 | FTD |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | FTD |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.5 | 2.0 | +0.5 | FTD |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.5 | 2.0 | +0.5 | FTD |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FTD vs stabble
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FTD | stabble |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FTD Limited | stabble |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Kingston Chambers, PO Box 173, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands R&F Yinkai Room 609, Huaxia Road No.16, Zhujiang New Town, Tianhe Guangzhou, 510623, China Central Park Towers, Office 14-45, DIFC, Dubai UAE 36 Purvis Street #02-06, Singapore(188613) | VG |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, CFDs, offers API | Trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FTD and stabble against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FTD vs stabble
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FTD or stabble?
Both FTD and stabble hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FTD maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (BVIFSC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas stabble maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FTD and stabble?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FTD records an Overall Score of 2.5 (Risk & Licensing: 2.5, Brand: 2.5, Market Influence: 2.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with stabble at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do FTD and stabble differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FTD lists FX, CFDs, offers API with execution software [MT5], while stabble lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FTD or stabble?
FTD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while stabble carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.