1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FPG vs INVAXA: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FPG (FPG) and INVAXA (Limehouse Markets (Global) Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
INVAXA outranks FPG by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, FPG holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas INVAXA holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FPG | INVAXA | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | INVAXA |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | FPG |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | INVAXA |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.6 | +0.4 | FPG |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | FPG |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FPG vs INVAXA
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FPG | INVAXA |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FPG | Limehouse Markets (Global) Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1276, Govant Building, Kumul Highway, Port Vila, Vanuatu | CT House, Office No. 9A, Providence, Mahe, Seychelles |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | cryptocurrencies, FX, global indices, precious metals, commodities, crude oil | Forex, stocks, commodities, cryptocurrencies, indices and more |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Japanese, Polish, Indonesian, Spanish, and other languages | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FPG and INVAXA against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FPG vs INVAXA
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FPG or INVAXA?
FPG holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, FPG maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas INVAXA maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FPG and INVAXA?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FPG records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with INVAXA at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.6, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do FPG and INVAXA differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FPG lists cryptocurrencies, FX, global indices, precious metals, commodities, crude oil with execution software [MT4], while INVAXA lists Forex, stocks, commodities, cryptocurrencies, indices and more with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FPG or INVAXA?
FPG carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while INVAXA carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.