1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CentFX vs NAKA: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CentFX (CentFX Ltd) and NAKA (NAKA Global Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
NAKA outranks CentFX by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, CentFX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas NAKA holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CentFX | NAKA | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | NAKA |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | NAKA |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | NAKA |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | NAKA |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | NAKA |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CentFX vs NAKA
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CentFX | NAKA |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CentFX Ltd | NAKA Global Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FSRC: Not suppliedFINMA: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | The Valley, No. 8 Cassius Webster Building, Grace Complex, The Valley, 1330, Anguilla. | Address: Bahnhofstrasse 10, 6300 Zug, Switzerland. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs on stocks, indices, metals, commodities, currency pairs, cryptocurrencies | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CentFX and NAKA against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CentFX vs NAKA
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CentFX or NAKA?
NAKA holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, CentFX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas NAKA maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (FSRC, FINMA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CentFX and NAKA?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CentFX records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with NAKA at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do CentFX and NAKA differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CentFX lists CFDs on stocks, indices, metals, commodities, currency pairs, cryptocurrencies with execution software [MT5], while NAKA lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CentFX or NAKA?
CentFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while NAKA carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.