1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Binarycent vs Interstellar Group: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Binarycent (Wave Makers LTD) and Interstellar Group (Interstellar Group) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
Interstellar Group outranks Binarycent by +4.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.3 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Binarycent holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Interstellar Group holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Binarycent | Interstellar Group | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 7.3 | +4.3 | Interstellar Group |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Interstellar Group |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 8.6 | +5.6 | Interstellar Group |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | Interstellar Group |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Binarycent vs Interstellar Group
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Binarycent | Interstellar Group |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Wave Makers LTD | Interstellar Group |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshall Islands MH96960 | Euro House, Richmond Hill Road, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | cryptocurrencies, market indices, binary options, commodities, options, stocks, FX | Forex, precious metals, crude oil, indices |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, Indonesian, and other languages |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Binarycent and Interstellar Group against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Binarycent vs Interstellar Group
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Binarycent or Interstellar Group?
Interstellar Group holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, Binarycent maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Interstellar Group maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles, SVG FSA, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Binarycent and Interstellar Group?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Binarycent records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Interstellar Group at 7.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 8.6, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Binarycent and Interstellar Group differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Binarycent lists cryptocurrencies, market indices, binary options, commodities, options, stocks, FX with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Interstellar Group lists Forex, precious metals, crude oil, indices with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Binarycent or Interstellar Group?
Binarycent carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Interstellar Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.