1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
BelFX vs NAKA: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BelFX (BelFX Limited) and NAKA (NAKA Global Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
BelFX outranks NAKA by +1.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.3 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, BelFX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas NAKA holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | BelFX | NAKA | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.3 | 3.0 | +1.3 | BelFX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | BelFX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | BelFX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.1 | 3.0 | +2.1 | BelFX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | BelFX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: BelFX vs NAKA
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | BelFX | NAKA |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | BelFX Limited | NAKA Global Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FSRC: Not suppliedFINMA: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Suite 201, No 8 Eve Street, Belize City, Belize. | Address: Bahnhofstrasse 10, 6300 Zug, Switzerland. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex (over 45 currencies), metals, commodities, stocks, stock indices. | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Arabic, Vietnamese, English, Russian | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare BelFX and NAKA against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: BelFX vs NAKA
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BelFX or NAKA?
NAKA holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, BelFX maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas NAKA maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (FSRC, FINMA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BelFX and NAKA?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BelFX records an Overall Score of 4.3 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.1, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with NAKA at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do BelFX and NAKA differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
BelFX lists Forex (over 45 currencies), metals, commodities, stocks, stock indices. with execution software [MT4], while NAKA lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BelFX or NAKA?
BelFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while NAKA carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.