1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
AUT vs CentFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AUT (AUT Trading Limited) and CentFX (CentFX Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
AUT and CentFX are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, AUT holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CentFX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | AUT | CentFX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: AUT vs CentFX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | AUT | CentFX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | AUT Trading Limited | CentFX Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | St. Vincent and the Grenadines AUT Trading Limited, Suite 305,Griffith Corporate Center, Kingstown. | The Valley, No. 8 Cassius Webster Building, Grace Complex, The Valley, 1330, Anguilla. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, indices, crude oil, metals, CFDs | CFDs on stocks, indices, metals, commodities, currency pairs, cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare AUT and CentFX against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: AUT vs CentFX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AUT or CentFX?
CentFX holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, AUT maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CentFX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AUT and CentFX?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AUT records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with CentFX at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do AUT and CentFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
AUT lists FX, indices, crude oil, metals, CFDs with execution software [MT5], while CentFX lists CFDs on stocks, indices, metals, commodities, currency pairs, cryptocurrencies with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AUT or CentFX?
AUT carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CentFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.