1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Aurum Markets vs Source Protocol: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Aurum Markets (Aurum Markets Limited) and Source Protocol (Source Protocol Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions
Source Protocol outranks Aurum Markets by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.3 vs 1.2)
On supervisory breadth, Aurum Markets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Source Protocol holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Aurum Markets | Source Protocol | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.2 | 1.3 | +0.1 | Source Protocol |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.2 | 1.9 | +0.7 | Source Protocol |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.2 | 1.6 | +0.4 | Source Protocol |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.2 | 1.6 | +0.4 | Source Protocol |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Aurum Markets vs Source Protocol
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Aurum Markets | Source Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Aurum Markets Limited | Source Protocol Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Office 212, Block A, The Junction Business Hub, Calebasses Branch Road, Calebasses, 20201, Mauritius | - |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, commodities, indices and metals | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Aurum Markets and Source Protocol against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Aurum Markets vs Source Protocol
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Aurum Markets or Source Protocol?
Both Aurum Markets and Source Protocol hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Aurum Markets maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Source Protocol maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Aurum Markets and Source Protocol?
In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Aurum Markets records an Overall Score of 1.2 (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.2, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Source Protocol at 1.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.9, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Aurum Markets and Source Protocol differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Aurum Markets lists FX, commodities, indices and metals with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Source Protocol lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Aurum Markets or Source Protocol?
Aurum Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Source Protocol carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.