Skip to content
Offshore Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

24option vs FxFlat: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 24option (Richfield Capital Limited) and FxFlat (FXFlat Bank GmbH) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: 24option-vs-fxflat

24option outranks FxFlat by +2.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.3 vs 4.0)

On supervisory breadth, 24option holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FxFlat holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology Weight24optionFxFlatScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.34.0+2.324option
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.04.0+1.024option
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.02.0+2.024option
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.64.0+2.624option
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.04.0+1.024option

Visual Architecture Benchmark: 24option vs FxFlat

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: 24option vs FxFlat
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between 24option and FxFlat.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit Attribute24optionFxFlat
Primary Legal NameRichfield Capital LimitedFXFlat Bank GmbH
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressCYKokkolastraße 1 40882 Ratingen Deutschland
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForexCurrency pairs, indices and spot gold
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese, EnglishDutch, English, German
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare 24option and FxFlat against other regulated peers in our selected international company and brokerage records: offshore jurisdictions slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: 24option vs FxFlat

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 24option or FxFlat?

24option holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, 24option maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FxFlat maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (BaFin) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 24option and FxFlat?

In Offshore Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 24option records an Overall Score of 6.3 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.6, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with FxFlat at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do 24option and FxFlat differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

24option lists Forex with execution software [MT4], while FxFlat lists Currency pairs, indices and spot gold with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 24option or FxFlat?

24option carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FxFlat carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

24option vs FxFlat (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Offshore Firm Ledger